Prediction of Kamil Majchrzak [91st] vs Christopher Oconnell [] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W L W W W W WH2H: Majchrzak 0 - 0 Oconnell
| Majchrzak | Stats | Oconnell |
|---|---|---|
| 77% (20-6) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 91 | Ranking | N/A |
| 75 | Highest Rank | |
| 29 | Age | 30 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 19 | Titles | 0 |
| 65% (416-227) | Career Total W/L | 0% (0-0) |
| $1,059,510 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Kamil Majchrzak vs Christopher Oconnell Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Majchrzak 0 - 0 Oconnell
Editorial Prediction:
Kamil Majchrzak Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Hugo Dellien
53%
(
30 of
57)
1st Serve %
75%
(
46 of
61)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
74%
(
20 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
48
|
7-6(1) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Marin Cilic
66%
(
59 of
90)
1st Serve %
60%
(
54 of
90)
4
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
41 of
54)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
27 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
90)
95
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Norbert Gombos
69%
(
84 of
121)
1st Serve %
72%
(
79 of
110)
11
Aces
15
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
57 of
84)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
57 of
79)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
36%
(
44 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
39 of
110)
116
Total Points Won
115
|
7-6(2) 3-6 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Pablo Carreno-Busta
66%
(
62 of
94)
1st Serve %
73%
(
83 of
114)
7
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
49 of
62)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
56 of
83)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
28 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
47 of
114)
113
Total Points Won
95
|
6-7(10) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Carlos Taberner
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
60%
(
45 of
75)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
10
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
84%
(
38 of
45)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
33 of
42)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
21 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
24 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Alexandre Muller
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
69%
(
58 of
84)
4
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
84)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Jesper De Jong
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
49%
(
28 of
57)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Jaume Antoni Munar Clar
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
43%
(
23 of
54)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
87%
(
20 of
23)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Sumit Nagal
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
47 of
71)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
22%
(
4 of
18)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Christopher Oconnell Recent Matches Played
Before:
No Recent Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65% (416/227) | Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 62% (929/566) | Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (7713/6274) | Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.34 | Aces Per Game | 0 |
| 2294 | Aces Total | 0 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0 |
| 1150 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:19:49 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 465.79 | Average Opponent Rank | 0 |
| 59% (22536/37974) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 71% (15986/22536) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (8061/15436) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 45% (1815/4056) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 41% (15894/38349) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 66% (403/607) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 28% (7/25) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (109/199) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (96/184) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 89% (422/374) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 11% (422/47) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 19% (221/43) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
